VAULT DWELLERS SERVED

Monday, March 9, 2015

When The Only Tool You Have Is A Hammer, Every Problem Looks Like A Nail

Warfare is the conflict resolution of Cain. Healthy species don't try to resolve every situation with war. Sick, dysfunctional and weak breeds do. It is a zero-sum game that simply creates meaningless cycles of carnage from which life can never improve.

I've believed this since the early 90's when a lot of my reading demonstrated there was no organized warfare on large scales in the past. There was never evidence for it. It only seems natural to Homo Sapiens because he can't solve his own problems. This is what rushes in to fill the vacuum where brains go on a real person.

10 comments:

NjordDanuson said...

That weaponized primate program that created homo satanicus was a trillion times stupider then operation toba...

KW Jackson said...

I'd add warfare is natural to leaders of Homo Sap's. Sap's just do what they're told.

Chris from Sydney said...

Silly Cro-Mag female attempts to due Thal exercises with hilarious results. Couldn't resist linking it for the LOL's

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2986331/Ouch-Horrific-moment-woman-s-leg-bone-SNAPS-doing-leg-press-gym.html

Texas Arcane said...

@NjordDanuson

A descendant of that melonhead went on to recommend the cane toad to control insects in Australia. He had thought everything through and there was nothing that could possibly go wrong.

styrac1 said...

I think you will find this interesting. It's a synopsis of the book "The Paradox of Homo Sapiens". It's in French so I had to use a translator and the text is unintelligible for the most part, nevertheless I was able to extract some parts relevant to why Sapiens is such a colossal failure, unmanageable both at individual and collective level, which is used as a rationale to justify that it is always necessary for saps to be under the control of overseers as not to destroy himself and his environment and this applies to both thousands of years ago and today with "global governance" and attempts to cull the herd.

http://www.europesolidaire.eu/article.php?article_id=462

I've highlighted the key parts (It's translator text so it has mistakes and can be unclear):

"modern western thinking considers that the man belongs to an intelligent species : homo sapiens. By intelligence, we may designate the capacity of self-representation within its environment, both for the present and the future. If the representation of the future suggests the proximity of threats, the intelligence should be not only to define remedies to these threats, but to implement those remedies to these threats that would be effective given the means available. The paradox of the sapiens is that, despite his undeniable intelligence, the human of today are unable to put practically implement the remedies to threats to its environment


policy human are essentially selfish, on the one hand, unpredictable, on the other hand. It follows that they cannot in general be subject to a control by what is called the consciousness voluntary rational, as may be (in general) systems anthropotechnique of very small dimension :

They can't admit that they are uncontrollable or low-governable, first in relation to their own interests, then, and more so in this context would be the governability of the planet as a whole.

It remains powerless to take the large collective decisions that could save the planet assaults that it inflicts. The disaster is, therefore, most probably, at the end of the path."

http://www.amazon.fr/Paradoxe-Sapiens-technologiques-catastrophes-annonc%C3%A9es/dp/2916913254

styrac1 said...

P.S. Whereas animals respond to imminent threats, man is supposed to able to conceptualize threats in the future and so be motivated to take pre-emptive action against them. In other words is the psychology of war inherent or is it a learnt behavior?

cbenediccengi said...

Iceland. Thals. Vikings. Extremely low murder rate. Highly social. Leave their Viking babies to sleep in sub-zero. Very high average life expectancy.

http://qz.com/351821/for-generations-icelandic-babies-have-napped-in-sub-zero-temperatures-outside/

In line with the article posted, Hafthor Bjornnson. 6'9", 370lbs, professional strongman. a friggin literal monster, but is a big soft, gentleman.

http://scontent-b.cdninstagram.com/hphotos-xpa1/t51.2885-15/1515958_343188125846152_454246659_a.jpg

Anonymous said...

http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2015/03/10/dogs-may-have-played-role-in-extinction-of-neanderthals/

Texas Arcane said...

@styrac1

After fifty years of thinking about the problem and reading on it, I cannot help but conclude that man is a manufactured creature with one of his designed functions being to fight in wars for the amusement of his masters and their gratification. Imagine Chess played with real people and the thrill this could bring to an avaricious ruler with an IQ high enough to regard humans as cattle.

They'd shrug and say "Match to you, let's play again" to their peers. "Let's set limits on certain kinds of weapons this time to make it interesting."

Since man is so compliant with orders to go to war you cannot help but infer that he himself is designed to have no initiative in such things nor is he designed to refrain, rather to simply march when told to do so like pieces on a chessboard.

NjordDanuson said...

The new improvamacated model of saps will be replaceing that old timey model any day now ... http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=b5c12d9b5e4725ee439e1c94b2b9c497

www.000webhost.com