VAULT DWELLERS SERVED

Friday, April 12, 2013

Amazing Validation of My Anthropology

Shoulder-to-hip ratio is deciding factor.

I've known my entire life that my 1.20-to-1 ratio is part of the subconscious reason that others will never be able to really see me as a human being. I've always known. I can remember being seven or eight years old and noticing it. When I was so skinny I could have turned sideways and vanished. I knew it was the ratio that determined whether or not you could be regarded as "human."

The huge back, if matched to a waist (lean or fat, doesn't matter) of approximately the same size, brands you as a slave or servant or "non-person" to Homo Sapiens. They are incapable of seeing you any other way. The "real" humans have narrow hips and broader shoulders. It doesn't matter if this is a serious detriment in close range combat and virtually guarantees they will lose in a hand-to-hand conflict. This build has only one purpose and it is fighting at a distance, not close up. This build is for hurling projectile weapons at a distance. It doesn't matter if this build is actually physically weaker. This is what is attractive to the Homo Sapiens female.

A Homo Sapiens female might find you attractive in some other way but it will never translate into any real affection or desire. To a Sapiens, a man with a waist matched to his shoulders is a slave who cannot be regarded in the same way we regard a real person. They don't know why they feel this way. It is instinctive, innate and ingrained.

How on earth did they develop this subconscious discriminatory evaluation without even being aware of it?

Because after eating the Neanderthal males and gang raping the Neanderthal females, they kept the hybrid male children as slaves in a narrow caste for at least 20,000 years afterwards. You can be assured that any Homo Sapiens female who showed any sexual interest in one of these slaves was likely to be ostracized or put to death. They were not real people. They would stand on the outskirts of the tribe or sleep on the open ground and (according to Celtic mythology) were forbidden to look anyone in the eye. The women were instructed to consider them as little more than dogs who stood on two legs.

The tribes that developed these caste systems (according to Celtic mythology) were victorious against anyone who opposed them. With Neanderthals as shock troops in the battle, it was a simple matter of coming in behind them and mopping up. With Neanderthals as scouts and watchmen, nobody ever got surprised, especially not at night. With Neanderthals fashioning your tools and honing your weapons, every spear flew straight and every arrow hit it's target. With Neanderthals tasked to fish, hunt and forage, your tribe was freed up to plot strategy and consider the big picture. Once you had a large mob of Neanderthal slaves, everything came easily to you and victory was always within your grasp. It was these tribes that conquered all others and it was their genes which came to characterize the European genome. All you had to do in life to succeed was to learn how to manage your Neanderthals wisely.

There are great parallels here between the Romans and their Greek slaves, who were clearly smarter and often stronger than their masters. The difference being that the Greek slave could often be recognized as a human being, only of lower status or authority. The Neanderthals were strongly typed from the beginning as the "not-human." The living ghost. A creature that one wields as one would use a hammer or a tool for some job. They were only required to be acknowledged when one was giving them orders, otherwise they are faceless men standing close by, waiting to be given purpose and direction. Females would be descended from other females who learned the proper regard for their kind and did not see them as possible mates or even as men in that way.

40,000 years later, nothing at all has changed. Not in the least. I can take you into any workplace in the world and point them out. There, there and there. They are the ones at their desks working, the others stand and chat and speak of how easy their lives are, of their plans to go on vacation, of their leisure time, of their luxury and the great ease with which they navigate their lives. This one here who is working is only a tool, to be tolerated as long as it is necessary to obtain his services and then he is invisible again. When a deadline presses, suddenly a smile is available and perhaps even eye contact. Like a carrot held before a horse, there is dangled the prospect of them becoming a full human in standing if they will only work hard and deliver what is required on time. When the deadline has past, it is like this same one became as transparent as glass. No one looks at him. They merely look through him.

9 comments:

tony said...

so true everywhere i've worked only one or two people actually work most are just hanging around.australia is full of docile sheep all repeating the same mindless crap they've been programmed with,its like living in a country full of robots

L.Short said...

This is all very interesting and new material..for me anyway.

Having stumbled upon your blog only a coupla' week ago, I am curious to see comparative examples of sapiens and homo sapiens in illustration or photograph.
Do you have two examples ( of anytime in history) you could compare?
If so, thanks in advance.

I've recently read in Carrol Quigley's "Tragedy and Hope"
that is was the Viking Raiders who originally built the Russian oligarchy system by enslaving the forest people i.e slavs.
I also am aware of the Royal hierarchy of western Europe which also sprung from the well of Viking Raiders.
Would the Norsemen to be the archetype of homo sapiens you label as different in character, build and intellect than that of the mild mannered sapien?

I enjoy reading your blog.Thanks again.

http://archive.org/details/TragedyAndHope_501
http://real-world-news.org/bk-quigley/03.html
that it was the Vikings
The Slavs first appeared more than two thousand years ago as a peaceful, evasive people, with an economy based on hunting and rudimentary agriculture, in the forests of eastern Poland. These people slowly increased in numbers, moving northeastward through the forests, mixing with the scattered Finnish hunting people who were there already. About A.D. 700 or so, the Northmen, whom we know as Vikings, came down from the Baltic Sea, by way of the rivers of eastern Europe, and eventually reached the Black Sea and attacked Constantinople. These Northmen were trying to make a way of life out of militarism, seizing booty and slaves, imposing tribute on conquered peoples, collecting furs, honey, and wax from the timid Slavs lurking in their forests, and exchanging these for the colorful products of the Byzantine south. In time the Northmen set up fortified trading posts along their river highways, notably at Novgorod in the north, at Smolensk in the center, and at Kiev in the south. They married Slav women and imposed on the rudimentary agricultural-hunting economy of the Slavs a superstructure of a tribute-collecting state with an exploitative, militaristic, commercial economy. This created the pattern of a two-class Russian society which has continued ever since, much intensified by subsequent historical events.

flash_aid said...

I been reading your blog for a couple of weeks now and find the material on homo sapiens versus the sapiens very interesting.

Could you possibly provide comparative illustrations or photograph depicting from anytime in history the physical differences of homo sapiens and sapiens?
If so, thanks in advance.

I've recently been reading Carroll Quigleys' "Tragedy and Hope" and having be aware Norse-blood to be a major source of the royal hierarchy of Western Europe since c.800, I was surprised to learn that they were also established the Russian feudal system as well.

Would you say the Viking were prime examples of Homo sapiens and the slav i.e. forest people examples of sapiens?

The character, intellect and physique of the Viking raiders seem to have overpowered the senses of the slav people even though they clearly outnumbered the raiders.....same goes for the Britons as well.

Quigley does assert (as opposed to your version if the Viking and slaves meet the homo sapien versus sapien criteria)that there was intermarrying which I assume would produce offspring /heirs.

Thanks for an interesting blog.






http://archive.org/details/TragedyAndHope_501

Part Three: The Russian Empire to 1917

Chapter 7: Creation of the Russian Civilization
The Slavs first appeared more than two thousand years ago as a peaceful, evasive people, with an economy based on hunting and rudimentary agriculture, in the forests of eastern Poland. These people slowly increased in numbers, moving northeastward through the forests, mixing with the scattered Finnish hunting people who were there already. About A.D. 700 or so, the Northmen, whom we know as Vikings, came down from the Baltic Sea, by way of the rivers of eastern Europe, and eventually reached the Black Sea and attacked Constantinople. These Northmen were trying to make a way of life out of militarism, seizing booty and slaves, imposing tribute on conquered peoples, collecting furs, honey, and wax from the timid Slavs lurking in their forests, and exchanging these for the colorful products of the Byzantine south. In time the Northmen set up fortified trading posts along their river highways, notably at Novgorod in the north, at Smolensk in the center, and at Kiev in the south. They married Slav women and imposed on the rudimentary agricultural-hunting economy of the Slavs a superstructure of a tribute-collecting state with an exploitative, militaristic, commercial economy. This created the pattern of a two-class Russian society which has continued ever since, much intensified by subsequent historical events.

Chris from Sydney said...

That explains a lot Tex, I just grabbed a tape measure and found the same ratio you described.

Oh well, at least I'm starting to understand why people treat me the way they do.

On the plus side I'm on the CLA you and Mex recommended a few weeks back and it's working a treat.

Chris from Sydney said...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pioneer_plaque#Figures_of_a_man_and_a_woman

Interesting shoulder to hip ratio on the male figure represented on the plaque aboard Pionner space probe.

I measured that as about the 1-1.2 ratio. Note the 'wavy' hair.

Why would the figure look like one of us and not one of 'them' ?
It's almost like the ultimate beacon sent from the missing children hoping their parents will come back, screaming out 'Here we are, please come back and pick us up'

FrankNorman said...

Historically, those warlike Northmen were the ones who helped protect Europe from being conquered by Islam.

Texas Arcane said...

Chris -

I had lost 8 kilos in 2 weeks on the CLA, my wife talked me into having some celebration dessert with her and I think I have put some back on.

The stuff simply works but you cannot get overconfident and just start eating 10x calories. It still helps a lot to stay away from carbs and control your intake (a little) to keep it going down.

I think the powder works better than capsules but the stuff tastes awful.

lucifer_6661_ said...

Texas ive been following you for 4 months now, and you intrigue me, this will be my first comment and i hope you answer. Is cristiano ronaldo pre disposed neanderthal or anything?

Texas Arcane said...

Yes.

www.000webhost.com