VAULT DWELLERS SERVED

Saturday, February 18, 2012

Russia : ITZ COMING, SOON

Russia is feeling the pressure to get off the fence and formally join up with the rest of the nations on the winning team in the coming World War.

China has got 5000+ miles of missile tunnels and is deadly serious about emerging the victor. All Russia has to do is support them with some tactical moves and WW3 will be wrapping up in a couple of weeks.

Anybody who thinks this is all sabre rattling has completely lost the plot. Whenever I hear some idiot say this looks like the start of a new Cold War I pity him. This is a hot war coming.

21 comments:

Anonymous said...

In case I sent this to the wrong email address for you:

I've been reading up on the DNA sequencing of Neanderthals.

Two questions:

1) All the charts show the frequency of variation between humans and neanderthals, and humans and chimps. I don't see any comparisons between neanderthals and chimps. The difference between neanderthals and chimps is inferred, but not directly tested or proven.

2) Why only chimps? How about rhesus monkeys, gorillas, orangutans, bonobos, and baboons? I would be very interested in seeing such comparisons.

Anonymous said...

I was slightly worried, but felt relieved when I read the rest of the current blog posts. Even if Russia ordered a nuclear strike, it's missile command staff probably wouldn't be able to get together enough wheelbarrows full of rubles for the bus fare to work, due to total, global economic collapse. And even if they somehow got to their missile launch site, they wouldn't be able to dig their way in due to the Ice Age layer of snow on top of the door.

Ghostwriter said...

If the sheet hits the propeller, my country will once again be at the wrongest possible place ( cant be helped really ). But the good thing about Ruskies is that they are inept to an unbelievable extent. Also i say that the coming war / chaos will have much to do with Race and Tribe and all that. And FYI im from Finland. Russia is awfully close.. : (

Anonymous said...

Of course, because China and Russia and everyone else knows that their own countries will be much better off after a nuclear exchange. I don't know why they've waited this long -- what's a few dozen nukes going to do to China's economy, along with the elimination of biggest consumer of their trade goods?

China will inevitably be a richer, more prosperous country after engaging in a nuclear war. It only makes sense.

Anonymous said...

Iran just halted oil exports to France and Britain apparently.
Just in time for the Ides of March.

- deadman.

Anonymous said...

I think you are wrong about one very significant thing. I do not think Russia and China can work together and/or coexist once the U.S. is not a dominent super power. Russia has something China wants very badly and if China is willing to enter into a nuclear exchange with the U.S. they might as well include Russia too because Russia will not join them and would not allow them to become dominant.

ChadZ from Wisconsin said...

I think Russia and China will cooperate to take the US down. But that the union will be short lived as each does not trust the other. China + Russia attack the US followed by the US counterstrike against each, plus the Russian attack against China and the Chinese attack against Russia. Makes for a pretty messed up world.

China would not let the vast resources of Siberia sit so close without making a play for them.

KWJ said...

http://www.smh.com.au/technology/sci-tech/controversial-armageddon-super-virus-recipe-to-stay-secret--for-now-20120220-1thwy.html

Perhaps this is the new definition of a "hot war"?

Texas Arcane said...

9:58 PM

You'll never see that study publicized widely - it has already been done.

Homo Sapiens is clearly the product of several different old world monkeys, all of these genes mainly affecting neurotransmitters for the brain. Neanderthals have no recent ape ancestry of any kind that can be discerned.

Texas Arcane said...

Agreed about China and Russia. As soon as they have finished off the U.S. they will probably go at it themselves.

Anonymous said...

Putin prepares for ITZ!

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2107242,00.html

$770 Billion to be spent on the Russian Military Machine over the coming decade, says Putin. That's quite a lot, but still that is equal to the amount the Kwa spends on their military every year. However, once you take out the grossly high wages Kwa workers recieve, in order to be able to survive and thrive in an extremely costly economy, I wonder how much they truly spend.

Also, no mention of the Perimeter Defence System by Putin. I wonder, since technology has become more sophisticated, why doesn't Russia fully automate the Deadhand System, and remove the need for an 'off' switch.

Anonymous said...

Make no mistake if China can dominate the world either by an actual nuclear war or by threat of a nuclear war, China will take Australia. China needs land and Australia is a lightly populated large chunk of land in their backyard.

Anonymous said...

Putin vows to "unprecedented" armament of Russia's military forces:

http://www.firstpost.com/fwire/world-fwire/putin-to-boost-russian-military-ahead-of-march-polls-219030.html

Anonymous said...

It is ridiculous and reveals great ignorance of the current geopolitical and economic reality to suggest that China and Russia would go against each other even after and if they eliminate the US. The only reason China would have to attack Russia would be if every other route to resources was cut from them, which is exactly what the globalist US establishment is trying to do in containing both by changing the political map in the middle east and North Africa but also in eastern Europe and in the Caucasus by installing globalist puppet regimes because it's about freejewm and jewmocrassy you see. As if these people can ever have democracy. That's the fairytale bought only by stupid liberals who believe in the equality of races and therefore that the same system of government could be adopted by anyone and exported anywhere anytime. There's nothing more ridiculous than this pathetic belief and when I read liberal bourgeois in mouthpieces like the Guardian justifying intervention and regime change because "these people deserve a chance in democrassy" i want to puke. The same people advocating democrassy and human rights as a pretext to war have practically forbidden elections and postponed them indefinitely in Greece because for once they could make a real difference.


Rather than doing it for the sake of Pissrael though, the globalist cabal controlling the US and much of the West created this cancerous cell in the Middle east and is cleverly using it in order to further their global imperium agenda in creating a world society of degenetate rootless cosmopolitanism and the destruction of all identities except for the one they use to impose. It's not China that is after Russia's resources. That's more globalist propaganda or perhaps wishful thinking on the same line with other claims such as that "Iranian nukes" will also be targeted against Russia. It's the western elites and the US establishment that are after Russia. Personally I'd like to see Russia arming and funding OWS subversives to see how the US government will like it being accused of "genociding their own people".

Anonymous said...

Great interview with Pat Buchanan

http://rt.com/news/us-islamic-crusade-buchanan-811/

Anonymous said...

Humanity is entering the most catastrophic phase in world history:

http://www.voltairenet.org/Moscow-and-the-formation-of-The

Anonymous said...

"Make no mistake if China can dominate the world either by an actual nuclear war or by threat of a nuclear war, China will take Australia."

Do you have any idea of the impact of a nuclear war? It could be an extinction event, in which case there is no winner.

If there is a winner, it's a winner who will preside over a world knocked 150 years into the past. We'll be back to the horse and buggy and be working towards steam engines. Why would China want that?

There's a possibility of a nuclear war, but it's unlikely to be started by the U.S., China, or Russia. A more likely scenario (still very remote) is it starting in the Middle East or between India and Pakistan, and escalating.

Anonymous said...

Soon? You say that every month. There will be no nuclear world wAr; there's no profit.

-rzero

Anonymous said...

February 21, 2012 9:56 PM

Uh, if you had paid any attention to the links provided here both by Tex and the blog's readers you'd know that the US missile defense shield is aimed to neutralize Russia's nuclear capabilities and ability to respond to a nuclear first strike which clearly shows that the decision of a nuclear first strike against Russia has already been decided. Nuclear war is not a possibility anymore but a CERTAINTY.

http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/Geopolitics___Eurasia/Putin/putin.html

Anonymous said...

"Soon? You say that every month. There will be no nuclear world wAr; there's no profit."

Thanks for your totally unnecessary and useless local-branch-fast-food-manager insight to the situation. In the meantime I'd rather listen to the people who really know what's going on with the world currently and are preparing for nuclear war:

http://larouchepac.com/node/21677

Anonymous said...

Russia ready to use nuclear weapons:

http://www.interfax.com.ua/eng/main/94710/

Putin pledges 400 new ICBMs

http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Putin_pledges_400_ICBMs_for_Russia_in_10_years_999.html

www.000webhost.com