Friday, February 10, 2012

The Ruling Classes, The Dismal Tide and The Organic Nature of Revenge

When you hear me spinning my rich tapestry of narrative about the melonheads creating Homo Sapiens, you should know that I am good at coming up with explanations that satisfy Ockham's Razor and they also hit the key facts of the matter with nice, tidy explanations where most of the orthodoxy has failed to even cover the bases.

That does not mean that I am correct, however. It may mean that I am one of the rare people who is even bothering to think seriously about this subject.

There are conventional albeit more pedestrian explanations that do not require quite as many suspensions of disbelief. I thought you might like to hear some of them so you'd be able to think about them yourself.

1. It is possible that the ruling classes have never produced slaves through genetic engineering, unless you consider interbreeding with your own social class a form of genetic engineering ... and it most certainly is, except with longer spans of time involved to produce outcomes. It is possible that the slave classes and the ruling classes have been produced throughout human history the same way, simple marriage. The more the rich marry the rich and the poor marry the poor, the rich get smarter and the poor get more slavelike. It is also possible that one of the mythologies fostered by the ruling classes has been that they deliberately created slaves to serve their needs, when in fact they were simply available, just as they are available now.

2. It is possible that the Neanderthals were never an experiment that escaped their labs ... but simply a rugged independent race of men who always lived xenophobic and reclusive lives far away from the urban centers. In fact, it is possible that the ruling classes frequently told the slaves who worked on their infrastructure that the Neanderthals were their "creation" in order that their slaves believe that they were the masters of everything - and that nothing was outside their control. This could have given rise to the myths of Enki and his manufacture of slaves for the "gods." The rulers could have encouraged these myths amongst their slaves to promote the idea of their omnipotence and to convince their slaves that they had been made for the purpose of doing as they were told. Perhaps once in a while a slave would ask why the Neanderthals lived wild and free and they replied "Well, we permit them to do so, you see."

3. It is possible that the Nephilim may not have been hybrid monsters made from Neanderthal genes. Perhaps the Nephilim were Neanderthals who were willing to part with their freedom in exchange for the right incentives. Maybe some Neanderthals descended to the cities and took pride in becoming guards and "watchers" (Book of Enoch) for the pharoahs and the master royalty. It is unlikely all of them were so immune to the attraction of power and prestige. Maybe the ruling classes liked to scare their slaves by telling them that their palace guards were part monster to assure even the staunchest slaves would tremble at the thought of revolt.

4. Maybe Homo Sapiens was not a deliberate product of melonhead thirst for revenge. Perhaps he was any one of a number of things, all of them possibly explaining why he appeared so quickly out of nowhere. He could have constituted a breeding population of Neanderthal rejects, as suggested here before. This would explain why he suddenly "appeared" in Europe. Maybe he was always there, living a couple mountains away in villages of outcasts and misanthropic descendants of Neanderthals. This would explain very easily why he killed the Neanderthal males and took the females. He felt entitled to do so in revenge for himself or his great-grandfather, thrown out of a Neanderthal tribe for being damaged goods. One of the problems with being genetic snobs is that sooner or later, the rejects can outnumber you if your standards are too high. Especially if you get kicked out of the tribe for being obsessed with sex and lacking in self-control. Your breeding habits might not be the preference of other Neanderthals but you will come to outnumber them by a huge margin in demonstrating these traits.

5. Maybe the melonheads are really any genetics where intelligence is not coupled with compassion and where the cognitive elite simply do as the dumbest humans do except with a lot more brains to attain what they desire. Maybe anybody who is smart but immune to any charitable feelings for other humans based on their shared context is really a melonhead in training. Perhaps anybody born with the dumb luck to be very bright who does not temper it with some empathy for people not as bright as he is will always just be a monster waiting to happen. Remember, no matter how big your brain, there is probably a guy right around the corner with an even bigger one who regards you as "subhuman." Maybe there is really so little distance between all men, including melonheads, that any of them can make the same mistakes in life and be judged unworthy for it if they are not willing to pray for grace. If the ruling classes are really so bright then how come they can only make things worse and never better? Wouldn't it be something if they evinced real intelligence and could improve the lot of everyone else around them without having to put them into chains of one variety or another and steal away with what little they have? Now that would be a melonhead that was worth a damn.

6. Perhaps the ongoing tragedy of the planet is that no matter what time you live in or under what circumstances, the real curse of all these hominids of various flavors is that none of them is bright enough to achieve any lasting peace, build anything that persists for long before it is torn down or create any principle that is any more useful than any given sentence in the Bible. In this way they can all be lumped together as different varieties of failures. Perhaps forgiveness and redemption is what every single one of them truly needs and that means that Christ and the doctrine of grace applies equally to all of them no matter what they think of themselves. If this were the case, there is only one hominid definition that truly matters and it is the division of the repentant and the unrepentant. Once you start to see this the way that God might see it all, you will find yourself saying just like he probably does ... sorry, but they all look alike. There is not one of them that has not gone astray as soon as he is born. Some of them so far astray it is highly unlikely they would ever reform ... others there always seems to be some small hope for.

Pondering these things gives you another kind of perspective on this subject and no matter what, remember I'm no prophet or seer and can never say for sure what happened more than 100,000 years ago. I will always just be making educated guesses.


Solsys said...

Another way to look at this : all leaders have started to rise out of their own people. They don't come out of the blue.

Complex civilisation is the rarest form of human organisation in history. The most common would be the tribe, i.e. some ruling families and some other families. For melonheads to exist, they would have to have kept on surviving somewhere in between civilizations, but that doesn't seem credible.

Knowledge is:
- infinitely reproductible (just as a computer file)
- free (but there is a high cost in being able to receive this free gift : education)
- can be created out of nothing (discovering, learning from experience)
- most importantly, cumulative.

As soon as a form of knowledge storage appears (mostly some form of writing) things go exponential, as created knowledge accumulates quicker and triggers sharing of ideas & conceptions, which themselves create new knowledge.

Knowledge itself cannot be imitated, but its results can. There are tribes that can steal secrets and methods, but they would not have been able to come up with them in the first place.

This is perhaps where a "racial" theory could be used, in that certain tribes have more knowledge "creators" or "combinators" than others, due to certain genetic characteristics that are less frequent, or lacking, in other tribes.

There is a delicate balance to be held between being open for an exchange of ideas (expanding the network of informations and points of view) and being invaded by knowledge-imitating morons (like the redneck plague in the comments section lately). Those civilisations who can manage this thrive.

Anonymous said...

Only a melonhead would imagine he had to cravenly beg for grace from some petulant skygod Jehovallah invented in the Middle-East. A real slave mentality.

Anonymous said...

Applying genetic exclusivism to the achievement of God's grace is in direct opposition to the truth of the Bible. So is denial of free will.

Your imagined superiority and division of men into perceived genetic classes hailing from an imaginary history is blasphemous. Your frequent childish self-praise and boasting is unchristian. You mock the coming suffering of others and proudly boast hate of all your bothers who have fallen.

If Christ's message was not lost in you, humble yourself before the Lord and have pity and charity upon your neighbours.

Matthew 23:12: whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.

Luke 1:51: He has shown strength with his arm, he has scattered the proud in the imagination of their hearts.

Job 22:29: For God abases the proud, but he saves the lowly.

Proverbs 29:23: A man's pride will bring him low, but he who is lowly in spirit will obtain honor.

Your hatred:

John 2:9: He that saith he is in the light, and hateth his brother, is in darkness even until now. He that loveth his brother abideth in the light, and there is none occasion of stumbling in him.

John 4:20: If a man say, I love God, and hateth his brother, he is a liar: for he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen?

JOhn 3:15: Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer: and ye know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him.

Matthew 5:43: Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy. But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you; That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust. For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? do not even the publicans the same? And if ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more than others? do not even the publicans so?

Proverbs 26:24: He that hateth dissembleth with his lips, and layeth up deceit within him; When he speaketh fair, believe him not: for there are seven abominations in his heart. Whose hatred is covered by deceit, his wickedness shall be shewed before the whole congregation.

Free will:

Deuteronomy 30:19-20: "I have set before you life and death, the blessing and the curse. Choose life, then, that you and your descendants may live, by loving the LORD, your God, heeding his voice, and holding fast to him."

Proverbs 1:24: "Because I called and you refused, I extended my hand and no one took notice"

2 Corinthians 8: For they gave according to their means, as I can testify, and beyond their means, of their own free will,

Philemon 1:14: but I preferred to do nothing without your consent in order that your goodness might not be by compulsion but of your own free will.

Anonymous said...

There's an interesting book online the Community might enjoy called Homo Erectus walks among us. He covers alot of the questions we talk about here. His main thesis is that the Higher Types of man might have fled from the ice ages at times and interbred with Homo Erectus populations - and thus the tremendous difference in racial IQ's.

He's strong on many points: Man became man outside of Africa, Neanderthals may have had many good qualities and thus the hybrid of Neanderthal and Sapiens may have come to dominate, etc. He doesn't deal with the question of lost civilizations and the Melon Heads though.

It's a free read. Technical at times but within the reach of the layman. The author is obviously a disenfranchised Anthropologist or Phd who dropped out. The last chapters are a heart felt Which Way Western Man meditation.

Anonymous said...

There's an interesting book online the Community might enjoy called Homo Erectus walks among us. He covers alot of the questions we talk about here. His main thesis is that the Higher Types of man might have fled from the ice ages at times and interbred with Homo Erectus populations - and thus the tremendous difference in racial IQ's.

He's strong on many points: Man became man outside of Africa, Neanderthals may have had many good qualities and thus the hybrid of Neanderthal and Sapiens may have come to dominate, etc. He doesn't deal with the question of lost civilizations and the Melon Heads though.

It's a free read. Technical at times but within the reach of the layman. The author is obviously a disenfranchised Anthropologist or Phd who dropped out. The last chapters are a heart felt Which Way Western Man meditation.

Anonymous said...

Tex, I have had many of the same ideas over the years. Nice to see someone else thinking of such things.

Anonymous said...

It's also possible that "melonheads" never existed, or nephelim, and that there were no such things as "urban centers" back when neanderthals roamed the earth.

In fact, there's very little evidence of much in the way of any kind of civilization beyond the ones that first sprung up in the middle east. While it's certainly fun to think that there are lost civilizations that date back tens of thousands of years, there's no evidence of any.

Texas Arcane said...

9:20 AM

You claim the humility preached in the Psalms but the truth is that God condemns whole races in the Bible regularly, labels entire genomes as inherently rotten and declares all men predestined before birth to their reward. I won't waste reply space by carefully extracting and reprinting these explicit passages from scripture here because I don't like to try to impress others with sheer volume of text.

Your genetic egalitarianism is a part of your Baptist theology and driven by your own personal vanity, that nobody is better than you are although apparently others are permitted to be judged worse. It's the southern self-righteous elect syndrome and is neither Christian nor scriptural. It borders on animal paganism and lowest common denominator mob mentality which existed long before the New Testament. Identical sentiments are found in many pagan religions.

I'm very familiar with scripture, there is hardly a need to quote passages from it to me.

The truth is, it infuriates mediocre people to discover somewhere there may be people stronger, smarter or simply better than they are. Again, they don't blink an eye to hear that there are worse and seem to accept it as a compliment to their virtue.

I'm different in that I recognize there have lived many, many people better and worse than I am, faster and slower, stronger and weaker, smarter and dumber. I don't stew like a chimpanzee at the prospect someone may be claiming to outclass me. Your feelings this way are not coming from self-righteous Christian indignation. They are a product of your vanity. You want to stomp around telling everybody they're no better than you are ... but this is not your virtue making you do it.

I know what "Christians" are in the United States and frankly, I don't like you. Mind you, I'm not sure this means I "hate" my brother.

I just don't like you. I think you are mostly huge phoneys. Sorry, but I don't care for your pretensions. It is lowest common denominator trying to dress itself up as righteousness. It is especially galling when simpletons quote scripture to you as if you are incapable of reading it for yourself. As if you'd understand anything there better than I would. That is conceit on your part right there that you're not aware of.

Texas Arcane said...


You don't even know what you don't know. You don't even know you don't know what you don't know.

The evidence is overwhelming.

Stop watching television and try to catch up on about 100,000 hours of reading. It should only take your thirty years or thereabouts.

Anonymous said...

Name calling with the 'hate' word:

It seems, that this new 'hate' category, is recently set up

against, and attempting, to replace,

the ancient and established categories of both (1) reality, and (2) sin.

Some groups today don't want to be confronted about their sins,

some groups today don't want to be confronted with reality.

So their policy is to try to vilify people who would identify them as such,

and, unjustly and incorrectly, accuse such good people with 'hate'.

[My view above Tex; but I was inspired by Orwell, below]

George Orwell was certainly a prophet.

Anonymous said...

Tex at 9:13

Except we both know(I hope) that being "stronger" or "smarter" does not equal being better.

Christ did not go around seeking the kings and the champions. He did not seek the healthy and the powerful. He sought the sick, the dumbfounded, the ignorant and the weak. His ultimate display of power was his ultimate sacrifice. As God incarnate, he knew how worthless were the ephemerous conquests of mortal men and their pride.

Far from being "mob mentality", making sacrifices for those you love and having mercy on those that have sinned against you is the best immitation of Christ we can achieve. Claiming belief but acting in opposition to the Christian message and not understanding a word of it will simply guarantee you burn. Faith without good works is vain and useless.

You shun most scripture but I quote you more truth:

James 2:14: What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone claims to have faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save them? Suppose a brother or a sister is without clothes and daily food. If one of you says to them, “Go in peace; keep warm and well fed,” but does nothing about their physical needs, what good is it? In the same way, faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead.

But someone will say, “You have faith; I have deeds.”Show me your faith without deeds, and I will show you my faith by my deeds. You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that—and shudder.

You foolish person, do you want evidence that faith without deeds is useless? Was not our father Abraham considered righteous for what he did when he offered his son Isaac on the altar? You see that his faith and his actions were working together, and his faith was made complete by what he did. And the scripture was fulfilled that says, “Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness," and he was called God’s friend. You see that a person is considered righteous by what they do and not by faith alone.

In the same way, was not even Rahab the prostitute considered righteous for what she did when she gave lodging to the spies and sent them off in a different direction?

As the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without deeds is dead.

Anonymous said...

Right, locking yourself up in a vault and opening champaigne bottles when most of the world burns will surely be your stairway to heaven. Boasting about it on will surely help as well. Ignore scripture at your own peril.

Peter 2:21: For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they have known it, to turn from the holy commandments delivered unto them.

But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog is turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire.

Romans 2:5: But because of your stubbornness and your unrepentant heart, you are storing up wrath against yourself for the day of God’s wrath, when his righteous judgment will be revealed. God “will repay each person according to what they have done.” To those who by persistence in doing good seek glory, honor and immortality, he will give eternal life. But for those who are self-seeking and who reject the truth and follow evil, there will be wrath and anger.

Anonymous said...

February 10, 2012 9:20 AM
"Applying genetic exclusivism to the achievement of God's grace is in direct opposition to the truth of the Bible. So is denial of free will.

Your imagined superiority and division of men into perceived genetic classes hailing from an imaginary history is blasphemous. Your frequent childish self-praise and boasting is unchristian. You mock the coming suffering of others and proudly boast hate of all your bothers who have fallen."

Using religion to justify the genocide of Whites is the ultimate blasphemy.

If Whites want to live separately from non-Whites, to ensure their racial continuance and self determination, people like yourself, call them "evil" and incite others to murder them.

Tex says:
"I just don't like you. I think you are mostly huge phoneys. Sorry, but I don't care for your pretensions. It is lowest common denominator trying to dress itself up as righteousness."

I treat these White anti-Whites with the scorn they deserve.

The Blacks that will take their daughters to breed, and mix them out of existence, will disavow their White ancestry, just as the American Blacks, descended from White Slave Masters, disavow their White ancestry, while demanding reparations for slavery from Whites.

When these White anti-Whites have vanished from the pages of time, they will be scorned by both Whites and their non-White descendents.

They are a people ending. We are a people becoming.

Anonymous said...

Tex, where is there evidence of these older civilizations? You've invented them.

Where is the evidence of these "melonheads?" You've invented them as well.

Texas Arcane said...

2:32 AM

I'll get you coming out of the gate.

Stop right now and tell me how far back the appearance of modern human beings has been pushed in the past five years. If you know, then maybe you know enough to be contradicting me on anything.

If you have to Google it to try to find out, you shouldn't be contradicting me. Go and spend 10 or 20 years reading on this subject and then get back to me and I will listen to you on this subject.

Anonymous said...

Except every single source you link is some unverifiable internet backwater source . I have seem such black legends and ignorant superstitions quoted here that I question how can you not be ashamed of how much stupidity you embraced and how many times you have contradicted yourself.

You have re-worked these genetic theories of yours so many times one has to laugh. And every time you did it, never once you stopped to say "I was wrong". Not only that, but you dismiss all those that point it out with a wave of hand and a lift of chin. There are articles on this very blog where you claim neandhertals were unsophisticated savages... where you embrace racialism and then deny it... etc, et al.

Not even your theology is consistent. You claim to be a calvinist but constantly praise age old heresies that conflict the very scriptural doctrines and our interpretation of them. Actually, believing yourself to be one of the "elect" is a heresy to calvinism in itself, being that you admitted to have been an atheist for 16 years and to have fallen from grace several times during your youth. I believe you are doing it again as we speak. I do not agree with the flawed arguments of the fellow commenter that quoted Scripture above, but I do agree that your current beliefs are in opposition to any and every Christian denomination and would warrant severe scolding from any Calvinist preacher from here on to Beijing. Fred Phelps included.

If you can abandon true belief so often, maybe you never had it to begin with. Ever thought of that?

Anonymous said...

Anom 1:09: The papist/orthodox/baptist/whatever he is never mentioned race in his argument. Scripture is clear in the fact that the black race has been cursed, but you would do well in arguing on the grounds of what he spoke and not on what you perceived.

I have been seeing your comments here for a long time(they are very easily identifiable). They are boring and most repetitive, as if you are unable to construct proper paragraphs and simply repeat effect sentences and logical runs you learned somewhere in an incongruent manner. It is most unpleasant, even when what you say is right.

Anonymous said...

February 11, 2012 12:37 AM
"Except we both know(I hope) that being "stronger" or "smarter" does not equal being better."

Stopped reading your Marxist drivel right there.

Anonymous said...

Nice dodge, Tex.

Anonymous said...

February 11, 2012 4:17 AM

>>>>easily identifiable<<<<

They are meant to be.

>>>They are boring and most repetitive<<<

The better to FIGHT YOU with.

>>>logical runs you learned somewhere in an incongruent manner.<<<<

In your opinion...

>>>>It is most unpleasant<<<<<

I am not here to entertain you or anyone else.

I am here to raise the issue of White GeNOcide.

White GeNOcide is not a trivial matter, if you are White and Normal.

Your entertainment is a trivial matter, compared to the issue of White GeNOcide.

>>>even when what you say is right.<<<

Raising the issue of White GeNOcide is always right.


Just remember anti-White, you are a people ending, through your own hand. We are a people becoming.

Your memory will be mocked and scorned by all races, including your non-White descendents, living in the ruins of a civilization, they were unable to maintain.

Anonymous said...

Tex I don't know why you put up with some idiots on here.

I liked this post, a lot. Very interesting stuff. But then I know scripture. For those of you unaware of it Tex has not abridged or ever altered a word of scripture up here. He has tried to elaborate and figure out what is being described which is exactly what you are supposed to do.

What is Nimrod if not a melonhead? These men are talked about all through Genesis, are you sure you are reading the same Bible as Tex? When I first heard these ideas from Tex my first thought was how complementary they were to scripture, not blasphemous. What would you expect from a bunch of Kwa who would have Ted Haggard or Jimmy Swaggart over them as a minister. Your faith is dead people but Tex is alive and he proves it by inquiring into these things with great curiosity.

Theres not a word of blasphemy up here. Not a one.

KWJ said...

Thanks for sharing. I'm working with #5 at the moment. Recently had the idea that, "If charismatic psycopaths can potentially utilize more of their brain for manipulative-thinking because of their absence of emotions for others; then could they have an effective advantage in all things social compared to those whose brains have larger areas for empathy-with-other?"

Anonymous said...

You lot wouldn't know and understand scripture even if a Bible grew teeth and bit you in the ass. You are drunken with the pleasure of pride and with the necessity of compensating your inferiority complexes. You have no concern for the word of God and you mock it and deform it in order to accomodate your debased views.

How pathetic it is to see a grown man boast about non-existant qualities on an internet blog. How sad it is that there are weaklings stupid enough to be a lead astray by his incoherent ramblings and grovel at his feet. God is not with you lot and won't be, your actions and your aspect shew it.

Years ago this blog was about survivalism pieces written by a hardcore calvinist. Now it is a blog about bullshit written by a self-praising, incoherent and undecided "alternative krischann". How low you have fallen Tex. Not only has your blog lost all use and utility, but now it isn't even good enough as toilet reading material.

Make sure to work on that vault and prolong your earthly dwelling as long as possible. You won't go to a pleasant place after this life is over. Not at all.

Sam said...

7. Maybe melonheads are Neanderthal and Cro Magnon or Homo sapiens sapiens hybrids. I posted before about the cross of zana the wild woman. Possibly a relic archaic humanoid.

One of her sons was very talented in mathematics and music. If you read about breeding of plants with wide variation you can get extreme outliers out of the mix. Luther Burbanks books are an excellent source to find more info.
I noticed that you stated that Cro Magnon was a big Dufus. Not so. Brain capacity was about 1,600 cc.
Speaking of breeding. Who, what, how was this breed?

Two views of King Tut's death with CT and x-rays

King Tut's Mummy Cloned using 3D Printing Technology

head of the mummy confirmed by genetic testing as the father of King Tutankhamen, and King Tut(see #4)

Sam said...

Oops need to add a link. This doc has pictures of Zana's children. Look at Zana's , I believe Granddaughter's head.

Interesting huh.

Anonymous said...

You so-called Xtians make me sick. I have found this all edifying in the deepest sense of the word. Tex has managed to turn what most think allegory into hard science in genesis and you Xtians are building him a bonfire.

Look up Ann Hutchinson. The same people that Xtians want to burn in one century, the next they defend as their orthodoxy. Its no wonder Xtianism is falling apart with you fakes running it.

Sam said...

Well I did look up Ann Hutchinson. According to wiki,"...The Puritans believed that absolute truth was revealed to man once and for all in the Word of God, the Bible... This truth eternal was a path to salvation on which they were determined to mold their daily lives, church, and state, and was their basis for coming to another continent.[42] Hutchinson, at first considered the godly wife of a pious and successful merchant, espoused a doctrine totally inconsistent with those on which the new colony had been founded.[42] Her basis for truth was personal communion with the Holy Spirit, resulting in immediate revelation apart from the Word".
So,"...Her basis for truth was personal communion with the Holy Spirit...". In other words she just made it up as she went along. HER personal communion was all that mattered. How she felt. Typical brain addled Female. Sounds like the mess we're in now. "If it feels right do it...Diversity...blah...blah...blah..." What crud.
And how interesting you saying we're Xtians. Amazing I'm reading "Eustace Mullins - The Curse Of Canaan" right now. He said,"...Nimrod stands unequaled for his symbolism of evil and Satanic
practices...The legendary symbol for Nimrod is "X." The use of this symbol always denotes witchcraft.
When "X" is used as a shortened form meaning Christmas, it actually means "to celebrate the
feast of Nimrod."
Interesting that you chose this for your post just as I read it a few hours before.