Wednesday, February 8, 2012

New York Times Does Open Hit Piece On U.S. Constitution In Plain Sight

Imagine the boldness. They're feeling really confident they've got this locked up.

The Bolshevists were telling the same thing to the Russian people in 1917. The Russians were out of step with the modern emerging systems of government, the Bolshevists said, new systems of advanced scientific management that would bring all the worlds people under a wonderful international umbrella of prosperity and plenty. Their existing legal system was just meaningless words on paper, they told the Russian people. A lot of Russians were dumb enough to fall for it, too. They were dying of starvation in the streets like dogs shortly after the Bolshevists pulled it off and took over.


Anonymous said...

The New York Times as well?

It seems the Jewish elites and their Shabbos goy, don't like the US Constitution.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg Trashes Constitution; Should She Be Impeached?

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Talks Constitution, Women And Liberty On Egyptian TV (VIDEO)

Anonymous said...

A people gets the government they ignore.

Anonymous said...

From the article you linked,
"The commitment of some members of the Supreme Court to interpreting the Constitution according to its original meaning in the 18th century may send the signal that it is of little current use to, say, a new African nation"

That sums it up quite nicely.
Of course the Constitution of the USA is pointless in a 3rd World African dictatorship like the Kwa.
Pure Gold Tex,you bring the best comedy anywhere on the net !!
Chris from Sydney

Anonymous said...

"The New York Times as well?"

The NYT has been the longest- serving, filthiest bolshevist agitprop mouthpiece, ever since it supported Stalinist genocide in Ukraine by reporting that "all is well". It serves the imperial-war agenda and the financier-oligarchic interests even more than the likes of the Washington Post and the wsj.

Anonymous said...

So let me get this right. A newspaper that is liberal is evil, and the wacky right-wing websites that Tex links to are good?

Are we in lock-step now? I think so. It's important to be in lock-step.

Anonymous said...

"Wacky right wing websites"...

How original. It's funny that the "liberals" of the 1960's were marginalized for searching for answers and information out side of the "mainstream". Now only "right wingers" and "terrorists" do it. We have come full circle indeed.

Anonymous said...

"A newspaper that is liberal is evil, and the wacky right-wing websites that Tex links to are good?"

Is that so? So I guess going around killing anybody anywhere around the world is ok as long as it has the NYT "liberal" stamp of approval for pinko brains like yourself. Moron.

Anonymous said...

This article is pretty interesting - so in the super wonderful Canadian constitution, you have the right to discriminate against others, and the govt has the right to be purposefully vague and change their constitution any time they want to - oh right, just like 1984. And since Canucks gave up their rifles, they get to be stomped on any time, any where.

Anecdote - 10 years ago I went on a bike trip across canada and in some small town out in buttfoo nowhere BC I stopped to eat breakfast - across the street the cops set up a checkpoint and people were coming into the cafe where I was eating, crying with stunned looks on their faces. I and some others asked what was going on - turns out if your insurance was not up to date for your vehicle the cops were taking people cars away from them (tow trucks came as I finished eating) and leaving them basically stranded in this small town (just the cafe there) out in the middle of nowhere.

I'll never forget the woman crying - had no money, needed the car for work, and no way to ask for help as friends were far far away.

Yeah that sounds like the govt I want to live under.

And now the cops in the USA are starting with the checkpoints and the robbing of citizens here too.

Only difference is that whole 'rifle behind every blade of grass' thing - of course who knows how, if or when the 'citizens' fight back.

But at least they'll have something better than butter knives to fight back with.

In truth, Mexico most certainly does not have 'gun rights' and guatemala seems fairly restricted -

So gun rights in the whole of planet earth, just the USA only pretty much has decent gun rights - and the idiot brigade is working as hard and as fast as they can to take them away.

I dont think that ends the way the govt seems to think it will.

And mr defender of the NYT - yes it is actually fucking EVIL to ignore a holocaust while it is going on and to actively convince the world of it. And the number of things the NYT has falsely and immorally reported are legion and ongoing right up to this very moment. Thank God they are sliding right into bankruptcy and will soon no longer exist.

Actually I think a lot of thinks are about to no longer exist. And that's why we come here to read what Tex has to say.

And if you dont want to hear what he has to say, the solution if pretty simple. Go somewhere else.


Anonymous said...

"So let me get this right. A newspaper that is liberal is evil"

Err no, not liberal.

Am ethnocentric newspaper, that is Jewish owned and operated.

Anonymous said...

February 9, 2012 7:44 AM

Jews hate freedom speech, freedom of association and countries that are reserved for White people, by their founding fathers, because Jews hate Whites.

And that is why Jews hate the US Constitution.

There can be no anti-semitism, without there first being semitism.

semitism = racism.

Anonymous said...

Meh, the times is right. The idea of constitutions in general has turned out much worse than nations without constitutions. Good lawyers can torture the most clear cut language into anything they want. Like communism, it's a nice idea that really doesn't work.

Anonymous said...

February 10, 2012 2:29 AM
Meh, the times is right. The idea of constitutions in general has turned out much worse than nations without constitutions.

Bolshevik Jew

Anonymous said...

Honestly, how are jews not whites?

Texas Arcane said...

1:26 AM

If Jews are seed of Abraham, how'd they get so white? You can't have it both ways.

When did the interbreeding take place in Europe? You know perfectly well it never took place. It didn't need to.

The question is not if the Ashkenaz are white. The question is if they are jews.

We all know we have whites walking around pretending to be jewish people. I just want to know when and how they converted. Their story doesn't appear to add up.

There is no magic wand the King of the Khazars could wave over his country and change all the turkish mongolians in his nation into insta-jews. That is not conversion to Judaism.

Anonymous said...

February 11, 2012 1:26 AM


We all know that Bob’s greatest failing is his indirectness, subtlety, and just plain being shy.

So when you don’t fully exploit a point I am likely to smile weakly and simper some indirect criticism.


When someone asks what a “White” country is, you tell them it is one of the countries they insist has an obligation to import huge numbers of third world immigrants.

THEY define it all the time.

General Wesley Clark defined what he would send American soldiers to die for: “There is no place IN EUROPE for an ethnically pure country.”

There is no place on earth for a Canada that is not multicultural, meaning multiracial.

Don’t get tied up defining something for them that THEY have defined.

A "White" country is any country, anti-Whites INSIST has an obligation, to import huge numbers of third world immigrants.

No one is Demanding Israel be flooded with third worlders and the locals forced to integrate, assimilate and produce children with the immigrants.

Therefore Jews are not "White".