Saturday, November 26, 2011

WW3 = China & Russia Vs. Kwa

The idea that a transition could ever be peaceful between two world empires is so naive and childlike it beggars description. The required ignorance of history is staggering to contemplate.

This is not the way Homo Sapiens works. People who think Homo Sapiens changes don't understand Homo Sapiens. Sapiens solves his problems by killing people who contradict him. He has a dearth of problem-solving skills and the only reliable resource he has is a resort to violence. When the only tool in your box is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail sooner or later.

A nation with an average IQ of 97 was never going to transition gracefully into retirement as a former superpower with a pleasant and tranquil dotage. They were always going to go out in a dance of thermonuclear fire amidst a terrible ragnarok.

Vault-Co was not "prophetic" to have foreseen this more than a decade ago. We could walk and chew gum at the same time. That was all that was needed.

Homo Sapiens was never meek. The Neanderthal always was. The first bones of Neanderthals ever found were inside a cave.

Instead of funding his enemies from the ground up, seduced by bizarre globalism into dismantling his own nation from the inside and shipping it to his future foe, the Neanderthals would have preached separation and isolationism. You know it's true. They would have believed in separate but equal. They would have told the Chinese, you stay on that side of the fence and we will stay on this one. They would have built a civil defense program like that of Switzerland and tunneled out half the United States. The Neanderthal would have done everything the opposite of Homo Sapiens because in his heart he was meek, not fierce and expansionary. Herein lies the extinction cycle that is the natural rhythmn of Sapiens since he first appeared. Sapiens is a boom-bust creature. Neanderthals, the children of Esau, are the definition of steady state conservative. Homo Sapiens and nuclear weapons were always a really, really bad mix.


Anonymous said...

November 26, 2011 4:43 AM

"Where do you think most of the 'nation wrecking leftards' received their direction, propaganda and material from?
I'll give you a hint, it starts with K and rhymes with gremlin."

The Communist Party was given the boot way back in the 1980s. The Russian people are now Nationalist and very Jew wise, from what I hear.

When Commies march on the streets in Russia, the best they can muster is a laughable handful, like the clownish Nazis in America.

When Nationalists marched recently on the Kremlin, there were so many, the Kremlin had to beg them to leave.

And sure, leftards take their orders from out of date fantasists, even ones that died a hundred years ago (see Karl Marx, Oy Vey!) and they always seem to have Oy Veys filling the prominent positions in their organizations - Strange...

Why was there a massive, violent, anti-War street movement, when the West was fighting Communism back in the 1960s and 1970s?

Yet we are fighting endless wars for Israel in the Middle East, for the last 10 years and nothing???

Now we are on the eve of WW3, because of these wars and there is still no effective anti-war movement, concerning the Middle East at all???

The two are connected. Can you figure it out?

Anonymous said...

"When the only tool in your box is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail sooner or later."

Anonymous said...

It will probably happen soon enough as the KWA knows that is becoming weaker every day while its enemies are getting stronger. The KWA knows that if WW III is delayed too much it won't even be able to deal only with Russia or only China , let alone both joined together.

Can the US leadership be that stupid?

"The treaty completely ignores the very serious imbalance that exists between the U.S. and Russia when is comes to tactical nuclear weapons. Today it is estimated that the Russians have approximately 10,000 tactical nuclear warheads while the U.S. only has a few hundred. These tactical nuclear warheads can be delivered by cruise missiles, long-range artillery or aircraft. The treaty does nothing to change those numbers. This would put the United States at a very serious strategic disadvantage."

Anonymous said...

If there was still any doubt that there is a build up towards WW III going on , reading this should make even the most rosy-minded optimist doubt it no more:

Anonymous said...

Chinese General: "China will not hesitate to protect Iran even with a third World War":