Saturday, July 2, 2011

Sapiens. Sapiens never changes.

Only recently down out of the trees and soon to go back up.

Without the abduction and rape of the Neanderthal females 38,000 years ago, this race would still be living in caves and eating their meat raw. Any semblance of humanity they have they got from a mild diluted injection of Neanderthal genes.

At 38,000 years ago, the resulting hybrid stock was topping out at 1600cc brain mass, but due to the preferences of Sapiens females, that quickly atrophied away, leaving them with a walnut sized 1350cc today and shrinking by the hour. Such creatures will never be exploring outer space in their pajamas like Captain Kirk. They will soon be worrying about where their next meal is coming from.

Wherever Christianity has tried to reach them, it has fallen on the ground of their hard hearts and withered without growing in that ugly soil. Today nearly all Christian practice is a barbaric sort of Zionist gibberish that would baffle Jesus Christ, unworthy of the name.


Anonymous said...

Oh man, the article is so biased and so wrong, and I can easily say that, being a colombian history student of native american descent. You shouldn't even link it. I despise specially the attempt to paint northern colonists in a positive light. The brittish colonists weren't exactly as christian and righteous as the text tries to play them you see... they later owned slaves and slaughtered indians just as much as the spanish did(although perhaps without so much brutality).

Also, not all is black and white when it comes to the spanish colonists. First of all, without the action of the church things would have been much worse, it is a shame that the priests were quite impotent in the face of the interests of the crown and the savage colonial entrepeneurs, but they always opposed what was happening(priests like Las Casas were the rule, not the exception). Later many catholics actually fought to defend the indians from the black heart of the conquistadores. The jesuits come to mind. Those were true christians, much more than the puritans who owned slaves and waged war against the indians for their territory. And they actually converted the natives to christianity, unlike the brittish. They did not abandon the teachings of christ, even in the face of death by the hands of their own countrymen.

Another thing: the spanish and portuguese that came to the americas after Columbus were mostly the desperate people, criminals, fugitives and low level military who were under negative influence. There were hardly any "knights", except those that later gained the title by being brutal and effective in the service of the crown. They were all adventurers and psychos, they were not religious fugitives as the puritans.

The article is shit. Period.

Anonymous said...

Normally I agree with you on most of your points but the webpage you linked is just plain unadulterated bullshit. If you want to look for examples of genocide look at how the US and CANADA were formed, how do you think you don't have Amerindian genes? Because the settlers of this nation nearly obliterated completely the native population either unwittingly (disease) or wittingly (dispossession, extermination). For all their defects the Spaniards who conquered America NEVER tried to exterminate the Indians, that's one of the causes of Latinamericas backwardness, but your beloved calvinists, oh they really did a fine job exterminating them. If that's not the case mention ONE state of US with Indian Population mayority (I can name COUNTRIES in Latin-America that are Native-Mayority). So please if we are to examine history let`s do it objectively, unlike the pavlovnized sheeple out there.

Anonymous said...

It's strange you use as a reference such a shitty source

Anonymous said...

The "genocide" of native Indians in South and Central America by the "evil" Spaniards is another Anglo-shabbos lie and pathetic piece of shit of propaganda to demonize the Catholic church and the nation Spain because, among other things like threatening England with annihilation, persecuted and expelled the Jews from Spain during the middle ages.

Every historian worth a penny knows that it was smallpox that wiped out most of the natives. And while there were massacres these were limited and isolated events suffered by those who were millitant and took arms against the colonists. More shockingly for the adherent to the Anglo-shabbos version of history, the perpetrators of these massacres were not the small in numbers Spaniards, but mostly other native tribes that joined Cortez in order to retaliate for the oppression and slaughter they have suffered from the tribes that have now taken arms against the colonists.

Anonymous said...

"Without the abduction and rape of the Neanderthal females 38,000 years ago, this race would still be living in caves and eating their meat raw."

Bonkers. Batshit. Utterly mad.


Texas Arcane said...

... you forgot, "true" RZero.

Anonymous said...

How do you know it's true? What evidence do you base this on?

Anonymous said...

@Anon July 2, 2011 8:55 PM

When the Spaniards arrived, the Aztecs were kidnapping thousands of people and pulling their still beating hearts through their chests.

Those evil Spaniards brought Christianity and destroyed their "colorful culture", for which all whites are forever guilty!

So all whites share a collective racial guilt and must pay, even though there is no such thing as race (in only white countries) because (in only white countries), "We are all human and no one is illegal!"

Anonymous said...

Anom 5:45

Yes, but that is not to say that the Aztecs, Mayans and Incas didn't have their merits. We are not niggers, we have a built-in capacity for building and mantaining civilization. Too bad we didn't have Christ before, but now we do.

Anonymous said...

@July 5, 2011 2:09 PM

You missed my point.

No one is saying all Mexicans share a collective racial guilt, because their great, great, great, great, great, great grand parents did something naughty, and because they did something naughty, it is Justified that Mexico be flooded with millions of non-Mexicans, until Mexicans become a minority.

They only make such arguments and justifications about white children.

They say white children do not exist (no such thing as race), at the same time, this race that doesn't exist, shares a collective >racial guilt< and Deserve to have all their nations and only their nations, flooded with millions of people that are not their race and for everyone to "mix in", until white people disappear (GeNOcide).

So this is my point:

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

Sam said...

Neanderthal genes survive in us:

The Neanderthal Women smelled like honey.