VAULT DWELLERS SERVED

Sunday, May 8, 2011

Everything is Six Degrees of Separation From Neanderthals

No kidding. Since May 10th of last year when they dropped the press release out there, I have become convinced that there isn't anything you could possibly describe that has to do with humans that I cannot immediately frame for you as a comparison between Homo Sapiens and Neanderthals.

Many people who have visited my home have noticed a common trait that you will see again and again in families with an overall high level of native intelligence - their homes are "messy" and somewhat "haphazard." Visitors to the homes of geniuses down through the centuries have noted this quality in their homes and possessions. If they wanted to put the swimming pool right outside their bedroom window to make it easy to jump from there into the pool, that's where it went. If they decided they would like to have a cot to nap on in the middle of the kitchen, this is where they put it.

This has been the case for a half a million years and the reasons are obvious. All Mousterian camps/Neanderthal sites show this same kind of limitless "freedom" in all regards.

Homo Sapiens has all the characteristics of a slave. He has "dormitory" and "barracks" qualities hardwired into his brain. He couldn't change these habits if he wanted to. There are primary perogatives burned into his psyche that he should keep his living environments organized in a way that is not organized around his own habits but rather what is pleasing to the eye of an observer or overseer.

Just as with polyphasic sleep, the Neanderthals showed in every possible way that their lives belonged to them and nobody else. They were their own bosses. If they wanted to take a nap in the middle of the day, that's what they frequently did. The Neanderthal never acted as if somebody was watching him and determining the acceptable limits of his behaviour. Although they have been described at times as being "dog-like," nobody has ever said that Neanderthals had the qualities of domesticated animals - but there has never been a quality European thinker of any note who has not concluded this very thing at some point about Homo Sapiens.

Examining the camps of Neanderthals, one also receives the exact same impression you will get in a household of very high IQ people - they are waking dreamers who enjoy a rich landscape of interests that pool around them in a series of enthusiasms which they keep close at hand. You simply do not see this in Sapiens living arrangements. They don't have enthusiasms. They just have indulgences. It's no wonder nothing they ever do ever goes anywhere - they lack the curiosity needed to ever penetrate any subject sufficiently to explore it. They have no dreams. If I were designing a slave, I would take away it's dreams. If I started with Neanderthals as my raw material for making this slave, that's one of the first traits I'd strip off in the lab. I would not want it dreaming when awake like the Neanderthal did. A slave should concentrate on his work and never lift his eyes to the sky. These creatures would never paint cave walls or draw rich tapestries on rocks if I had my say in their design.

The reason this is very relevant is that we are in the midst of seeing the entire planet turned into a classic barracks arrangement for Homo Sapiens. The elites describe it as "inevitable." It's not inevitable. In fact, it is only Sapiens psychology that makes it possible. I challenge you to ever domesticate Neanderthals in the way they are yoking Sapiens right now. You couldn't do it. The New World Order would never get any traction in a Neanderthal society. It is impossible to enslave creatures whose dreams are so predictive of consequences they would always be one step ahead of anyone who attempted to make himself their master. It would be like trying to herd Siamese cats. The Neanderthal was indomitable in his native form because of this incapacity for regimentation, completely the opposite of Sapiens in every way. Sapiens capitalized on these zombie-like traits in his makeup when it came to waging war and creating divisions of labor.

The New World Order hinges on Sapiens submitting to a voice telling him "Your quarters are not well organized, slave. You must submit to a higher authority which will organize them for you and see to it they are not permitted to get this messy again." Sapiens is susceptible to these sorts of suggestions because of his innermost nature ... and nothing else. Neanderthals would kick off in these people's asses in a heartbeat if anyone ever tried to do the same to them.

I'm telling you this so that you know if there is any part of you capable of resistance, believe me when I tell you that's the good part. It's the Rhesus Monkey in you that wants to believe these lies ... but if there is any Neanderthal in you, it wants to shatter these chains and be free.

Genesis 38-40

38 And Esau said to his father, “Have you only one blessing, my father? Bless me—me also, O my father!” And Esau lifted up his voice and wept.
39 Then Isaac his father answered and said to him:
“ Behold, your dwelling shall be of the fatness of the earth,
And of the dew of heaven from above.

40 By your sword you shall live,
And you shall serve your brother;
And it shall come to pass, when you become restless,
That you shall regain dominion and break his yoke from your neck.”

18 comments:

Anonymous said...

Tex what do you make of the story of Gilgamesh and Enkidu in the Sumerian Epic of Gilgamesh? Enkidu seems to be an allusion of the Neanderthal while Gilgamesh of Sapiens. The physical description of Enkidu says that "He is bigger of bone. This is the one who was reared on the milk of wild beasts. He is the greatest of strength" and also "This is the strong comrade, the one who brings help to his friend in his need." He is clearly presented as someone who is stronger and virtuous despite living in the wild and running next to the wild beasts as opposed to Gilgamesh who is a king. Gilgamesh tricks Enkidu (by offering him a harlot) to become friends with him so that he too becomes "civilized" but Enkidu, not being able to fit in this kind of life, that of rules and the coercive order of civilization, soon dies. As with the Esau/Jacob story and the "Birthright", it seems that in this story too Sapiens wanted to acquire something valuable that was in possession of the Neos (which Sapiens regarded as vital for the further development of civilization, perhaps genetic in nature given Enkidu had sex with the Sapiens harlot) and then either he killed him or, more probably, Neo could not survive in this new "civilization" that he enabled Sapiens to create because it was completely out of his nature, yet still his influence is with us.

Chad from Wisconsin said...

I have an IQ of 140+ My basement contains about 12,000 books on a variety of subjects - my doomsday knowledge vault. Along with all the "might be useful to have later" items I pick up from yard sales and second hand shops. Your post hit it on the head. The people I work with don't have the curiousity about anything... Other than Booze sports and work. I am the odd one because I will find a topic that interests me and gather a dozen of more books on it, study them and experiment. A truly wonderful post. Thanks

Texas Arcane said...

Anon 8:08 AM

I have believed wholeheartedly since last year that the Sumerian stories are allegorical recollections of things that really happened.

The "strong comrade" part would obviously be a threat to anyone who would seek to enslave the human race. This solidarity between humans seen in Neanderthal would have to be replaced with a more treacherous nature, a sort of foolish vanity that made them more atomic and therefore controllable. They would betray each other for favors and honors, whereas Neos were simply too altruistic in the in-group to ever be properly domesticated.

You understand there is only so much I can get across in a blog post, I am well aware that what little I am willing to talk about now would cause most people to think I am crazy. I have to measure out what I can say on this subject.

Anonymous said...

It opens a broad topic indeed. Lies are of necessity bound with socially acceptable narrative. Self awareness amongst sapiens consists for the most part of the repeated affirmations and narratives imprinted upon them at an early age. As a slave species, how could it be otherwise? Truth needs no narrative, the propriety of action is manifest in the result, not the justification.

Anonymous said...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1384644/Dont-fret-telling-fibs-makes-human-says-new-book.html

Dishonesty is now seen as maturity.

Sam said...

I think your mistaken about Neanderthal/Sapiens battle. The true battle is between Homo Sapien and Homo sociopath. The sociopaths are running the major powers. Your hope that the ,"Kwanzanian's get what they deserve" is a bit distressing to me. I wish you would let up on that a little. How would I stop the sociopaths? I have no control over what's going on. They control the voting process in the primarys. Making sure that any choice is their choice.

j said...

Hm, interesting. I wonder if you subscribe to Zecharia Sitchin's hypothesis: that Homo sapiens were genetically engineered from the pre-existing hominids of Earth by technologically advanced extra-terrestrials to be a slave race. Combine that with a little David Icke and suppose that these same extra-terrestrial overlords are still around, and it is their influence that accounts for the cunning psychopathy of the NWO... am I close to the mark?

I wouldn't worry about people thinking you're crazy. When people say "crazy," what they mean is "not socially acceptable," and they say it while oblivious to the fact that they believe things that are equally ridiculous, but much more kosher to say in public. Plus, those people would already think the author of this blog is crazy.

Texas Arcane said...

When you think of Sapiens zombies cheering the "death of Osama" in the streets and chucking beer cans at cars and hanging off street lights vomiting as they "celebrate" what they believe is a targeted assassination of a man who was never permitted a defense, it is difficult to feel sorry for them when they detonate the 220 kiloton military weapon in a major city to stage a false flag "retaliation" for the fake assassination of a man who is essentially Orwell's "Goldberg."

Anonymous said...

Off-topic and old news, but one can't mention it often enough: if you put your creativity in the service of the corrupt Western regimes, your reward will be untimely death:

http://www.projectcamelot.org/
marconi.html

"Most incidents occurred after the men had successfully completed important projects or left one job for another."

The West is finished. I'll be cheering for Russia from now on.

Anonymous said...

I've been reading up on neanderthals. There's speculation that they were a female dominated species that tended towards BDSM practices, bi-sexuality, and homosexuality and they were not monogamous. Interesting stuff.

Anonymous said...

Tex, I think I understand what you mean about this enslavement of the human race, and how it was engineered this way. Which explains why Sapiens has suppressed in his subconscious all the ancient knowledge that speaks about it and is in constant denial, out of fear that this knowledge would become part of his conscious self and fear of the imperative to act according to this knowledge (ie to rebel).

Texas Arcane said...

Anon 2:32

They were not a female dominated race, they were a warrior race who deferred to the female in all things. The bones of Neanderthals were like the remains of rodeo clowns - it is widely believed they tackled wild animals and choked them to death with their bare hands. The Neanderthal female skeleton is pristine and unmarked, it is expected that the strongest taboo amongst Neanderthals was to ever strike a woman.

I've read all the papers you referenced, the rest of them are from the same people who told you that Neanderthals were cannibal apes who could not speak for the past 120 years and that we had no Neo ancestry. Sorry, three strikes in my book that far afield and you're out. If you know the original data (and I do) you'd know that when they say Neanderthal was a "sadomasochist" they still do not really understand anything of what they are talking about. What those idiots (ever in search of tenure) have fabricated betrays they have no neanderthal ancestry or they would be better thinkers.

What is being talked about there is the hypothesis that they were like golden retrievers with babies - unbelievably tolerant. Of course, you also have the other side of a golden retriever, who can be a very vicious guard dog when he thinks the family is threatened. Neanderthal was like a kitten once behind the village wall with women, children and animals ... once on the other side of the wall, he was a 300 pound superhuman killing machine. That's what they anemic, feebleminded academics are trying to grasp there.

Anonymous said...

Anon 2:32

you're describing bonobos

or the general profile of majority cohort in Detroit

Anonymous said...

Off topic but worth sticking and email address into

http://www.ips.gov.au/mailman/listinfo/ips-flare-alert

Cheers
J

bill said...

Tex, for a bloke so fond of quoting genesis, then gibbering about millions of years and neanderthals, you come across as full of shit.
Ive known a couple of people who supposedly had very high iq, mad as hatters.

Texas Arcane said...

Bill,

Your basic assumption is that Creationists and the Scofield Reference Bible, essential blasphemies of the Kwa, carry any weight around here. They don't. Remember Scofield's heresy was referred to as "The Devil's Bible" for 150 years before enough people died off to forget it.

I'm a Calvinist, which means specifically not an Arminian. That's a type of Christian which used to be common. They are traditionally very, very smart people and extremely good at integrating all existing human knowledge to support scripture.

I'd elaborate but it's not my responsibility to bring you up to date on thirty years of missing education and nobody could be expected to do so in a couple of comments on a blog.

Needless to say, you're a Kwanzanian and you don't even know what you don't know. You don't even know that you don't know what you don't know, which is like knowing less than nothing at all about anything.

dé bile said...

Not sure if you'll read this in a 2 year old blog post.

You say you're a calvinist, which is quite ironic considering that it would be the religion of the melonheads.

It was created back then and used by the oppressors to control the oppressed. Calvinism had a massive success in the higher European classes. Those same people who would create the danse macabre in an attempt to appease the people's contempt.
In both instances, they try to convince the less fortunate that everything is pre determined, that their state and fate won't be changed. Keep working on that plow for a pittance, nothing can be changed, there's no hope, forget about your dreams...
They would sometimes disguise themselves as plebs and preach this.
Don't dream it's useless. Eventually everyone will be judged and you will be rewarded in heaven for your patient suffering, don't worry.

dé bile said...

Not sure if you'll read this in a 2 year old blog post.

You say you're a calvinist, which is quite ironic considering that it would be the religion of the melonheads.

It was created back then and used by the oppressors to control the oppressed. Calvinism had a massive success in the higher European classes. Those same people who would create the danse macabre in an attempt to appease the people's contempt.
In both instances, they try to convince the less fortunate that everything is pre determined, that their state and fate won't be changed. Keep working on that plow for a pittance, nothing can be changed, there's no hope, forget about your dreams...
They would sometimes disguise themselves as plebs and preach this.
Don't dream it's useless. Eventually everyone will be judged and you will be rewarded in heaven for your patient suffering, don't worry.

www.000webhost.com