VAULT DWELLERS SERVED

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

World's Best Climatologists Say That Global Warming Is Utter, Absolute Drivel

Peer reviewed paper in the December 2007 issue of the International Journal of Climatology of the Royal Meteorological Society.

The fundamental question is whether the observed warming is natural or anthropogenic (human-caused). Lead author David Douglass said: “The observed pattern of warming, comparing surface and atmospheric temperature trends, does not show the characteristic fingerprint associated with greenhouse warming. The inescapable conclusion is that the human contribution is not significant and that observed increases in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases make only a negligible contribution to climate warming.”

Co-author John Christy said: “Satellite data and independent balloon data agree that atmospheric warming trends do not exceed those of the surface. Greenhouse models, on the other hand, demand that atmospheric trend values be 2-3 times greater. We have good reason, therefore, to believe that current climate models greatly overestimate the effects of greenhouse gases. Satellite observations suggest that GH models ignore negative feedbacks, produced by clouds and by water vapor, that diminish the warming effects of carbon dioxide.”

Co-author S. Fred Singer said: “The current warming trend is simply part of a natural cycle of climate warming and cooling that has been seen in ice cores, deep-sea sediments, stalagmites, etc., and published in hundreds of papers in peer-reviewed journals. The mechanism for producing such cyclical climate changes is still under discussion; but they are most likely caused by variations in the solar wind and associated magnetic fields that affect the flux of cosmic rays incident on the earth’s atmosphere. In turn, such cosmic rays are believed to influence cloudiness and thereby control the amount of sunlight reaching the earth’s surface and thus the climate.” Our research demonstrates that the ongoing rise of atmospheric CO2 has only a minor influence on climate change. We must conclude, therefore, that attempts to control CO2 emissions are ineffective and pointless. – but very costly.

I envy those with the patience to articulate what I lost interest in convincing others of a long time ago.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Sorry, nothing to do with climate change, but I saw it, and thought of you ....

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7130014.stm

Any ideas on this strange story?

Texas Arcane said...

Weird. Catastrophism seems to be the only reliable pattern for Earth's history.

Anonymous said...

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=David_Douglass

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=John_R._Christy

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=S._Fred_Singer

We support Ukraine and condemn war. Push Russian government to act against war. Be brave, vocal and show your support to Ukraine. Follow the latest news HERE