Read this blowhard piece about the evils of setting foundlings on doorsteps.
One of the highest expressions of human love and charity is to provide for foundlings. It is an ancient Christian practice. It vanished for a while with improvementation in Europe but has recently made a comeback which is annoying the hell out of the genocidal psychopaths at the United Nations.
Basically, when a young mother has a child she simply can't care for or feed, for whatever reason, a baby hatch is the last resort of opportunity. The idea of abandoning children to hospitals and orphanages is tragic, heart-rending and sad. Grownups understand that life itself produces these tragic circumstances often and the humane way to cope with them is to provide some avenue for the mother to surrender custody to an institution that can at least feed them.
The homicidal dribbling morons at the United Nations would like to see these babies aborted, the sensible thing to do according to their lunatic lights. If you discover raising a baby is hard, just smash it's head with a mallet the way they do in India and be done with it. After the crying stops it's back to the disco club scene for a wild night of post-infanticide recovery!!! This is the actual way the people at the United Nations plan to improve our world. They see it as the highest good.
Sane people see baby-killing as the monstrous crime against nature and God that it is. That's why they provide for mothers to surrender them instead of doing something crazy the way the United Nations would like - have it aborted or just give it a quick top up with cyanide the way Peter Singer, a nazi-style eugenicist beloved of improvers and enrichers worldwide recommends. Singer was recently explaining how it isn't a crime if you off the baby in it's first year of birth - it is like taking goods back in retail because you decide you don't like them and want a refund. The New World Order loves this Aussie, who has also recommended we use retarded people in medical experiments because they will give better results in trials. It's true - I use retards in all my perimeter security tests and I give my highest seal of approval. They are much better for training turrets to autotarget moving objects than those gorillas I used in the past. I just give'em a box of crackers and set them loose in the exclusion field. You should see'em smile.
Remember kids, the difference between the Nazis and these people is that when the Nazis advocated it, it was evil. When they do it, they're the "good guys" trying to "help us." John Holdren-style in boxcars most of the way I imagine.
By honoring Peter Singer with Australia's highest civilian award the Gilliard government has again demonstrated their loss of the right to any leadership over the electorate and must immediately step down. They do not have the consent of the governed and the U.N. themselves would point out they cannot govern our country, it violates international law. Maybe we Australians should ask the U.N. to intervene on our behalf to protect us from our genocidal government who were never elected as our leadership. Honoring Peter Singer is identical to pinning a merit badge on Adolph Hitler for introducing the principles of utilitarian philosophy into German governance.