(Very graphic links, warning this is what is happening in the real world)
Oprah Winfrey was telling you South Africa was on a golden path to utopia in 2001. It still suffered from afterglow under apartheid which it was just then shaking off to return to it's "normal" state. Oprah was convinced that the dying embers of European rule were in fact the beginnings of a grand new era of peace and prosperity at the hands of magnificent bonobo administrators.
Vault-Co told you it was headed down greased rails to classic Chimpbabwe hellworld.
What was odd about all of this? Oprah was as vague as the rest of the mass media. Other than beautiful platitudes and sentiments, you didn't hear much news out of Africa in the mainstream at all.
One of us was lying. One of us got it wrong. Was it Vault-Co or was it Oprah?
What was the difference in our paradigm that made it possible for Vault-Co to accurately foresee the future but proved Oprah utterly incorrect altogether?
Vault-Co continues to insist that simply reporting the news from reality for one month in the mass media would lead to armed revolution in the streets. True. That's the reason the media is so tightly controlled, to prevent any contact between the mushy confused brains of the Western population and the ugly world out there beyond the glass wall of the Propasphere.
Once isolated inside this sensory deprivation tank, all kinds of miracles of human mental engineering become possible ... gun control ... global warming ... carbon sequestration ... "free elections" .... "wars to make peace," ... etc ... the only stipulation is that no real news must ever be permitted to slip past the opaque barrier of baloney.